core: bump codespell from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0 (#12762)
* core: bump codespell from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0 Bumps [codespell](https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell) from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell/releases) - [Commits](https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell/compare/v2.3.0...v2.4.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: codespell dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> * fix Signed-off-by: Jens Langhammer <jens@goauthentik.io> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Langhammer <jens@goauthentik.io> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jens Langhammer <jens@goauthentik.io>
This commit is contained in:
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ In this optional section, provide some example use cases for the feature. Who wo
|
||||
|
||||
Dive deeper into explaining the concepts behind the feature/component.
|
||||
|
||||
Write about the feature/functionalilty from the user's perspective. What is this feature used for, why should they use it, are there situations where they should **_not_** use it?
|
||||
Write about the feature/functionality from the user's perspective. What is this feature used for, why should they use it, are there situations where they should **_not_** use it?
|
||||
|
||||
> Pro Tip: If you were writing the related procedural topic, and you found that you had a lot to say about the topic, this is exactly where that info would go (not crowded up at the top of the procedural topic!).
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user