* web: Add InvalidationFlow to Radius Provider dialogues
## What
- Bugfix: adds the InvalidationFlow to the Radius Provider dialogues
- Repairs: `{"invalidation_flow":["This field is required."]}` message, which was *not* propagated
to the Notification.
- Nitpick: Pretties `?foo=${true}` expressions: `s/\?([^=]+)=\$\{true\}/\1/`
## Note
Yes, I know I'm going to have to do more magic when we harmonize the forms, and no, I didn't add the
Property Mappings to the wizard, and yes, I know I'm going to have pain with the *new* version of
the wizard. But this is a serious bug; you can't make Radius servers with *either* of the current
dialogues at the moment.
* web/bugfix/fix-reporting-in-wizard-submit
# What
- Preserves the errors locally for the Wizard, providing explanation and links to fix the issues
# Why
Just a silly mistake on my part. There shouldn't be two copies of errors (and there isn't in the BIG
PRs), but this is how it's designed right now and making the errors show up is an easy fix. In doing
so, the "hack" to move the "bad provider name" to the provider page is included.
* Updated package.json to use Chromedriver 130
* web: Add InvalidationFlow to Radius Provider dialogues
## What
- Bugfix: adds the InvalidationFlow to the Radius Provider dialogues
- Repairs: `{"invalidation_flow":["This field is required."]}` message, which was *not* propagated
to the Notification.
- Nitpick: Pretties `?foo=${true}` expressions: `s/\?([^=]+)=\$\{true\}/\1/`
## Note
Yes, I know I'm going to have to do more magic when we harmonize the forms, and no, I didn't add the
Property Mappings to the wizard, and yes, I know I'm going to have pain with the *new* version of
the wizard. But this is a serious bug; you can't make Radius servers with *either* of the current
dialogues at the moment.
* First things first: save the blueprint that initializes the test runner.
* Committing to having the PKs be a string, and streamlining an event handler. Type solidity needed for the footer control.
* web/admin/better-footer-links
# What
- A data control that takes two string fields and returns the JSON object for a FooterLink
- A data control that takes a control like the one above and assists the user in entering a
collection of such objects.
# Why
We're trying to move away from CodeMirror for the simple things, like tables of what is essentially
data entry. Jens proposed this ArrayInput thing, and I've simplified it so you define what "a row"
is as a small, lightweight custom Component that returns and validates the datatype for that row,
and ArrayInput creates a table of rows, and that's that.
We're still working out the details, but the demo is to replace the "Name & URL" table in
AdminSettingsForm with this, since it was silly to ask the customer to hand-write JSON or YAML,
getting the keys right every time, for an `Array<Record<{ name: string, href: string }>>`. And some
client-side validation can't hurt.
Storybook included. Tests to come.
* Not ready for prime time.
* One lint. Other lints are still in progress.
* web: lots of 'as unknown as Foo'
I know this is considered bad practice, but we use Lit and Lit.spread
to send initialization arguments to functions that create DOM
objects, and Lit's prefix convention of '.' for object, '?' for
boolean, and '@' for event handler doesn't map at all to the Interface
declarations of Typescript. So we have to cast these types when
sending them via functions to constructors.
* web/admin/better-footer-links
# What
- Remove the "JSON or YAML" language from the AdminSettings page for describing FooterLinks inputs.
- Add unit tests for ArrayInput and AdminSettingsFooterLinks.
- Provide a property for accessing a component's value
# Why
Providing a property by which the JSONified version of the value can be accessed enhances the
ability of tests to independently check that the value is in a state we desire, since properties can
easily be accessed across the wire protocol used by browser-based testing environments.
* Ensure the UI is built from _current_ before running tests.
* core: add ability to provide reason for impersonation
Signed-off-by: Marc 'risson' Schmitt <marc.schmitt@risson.space>
* tenants api things
Signed-off-by: Marc 'risson' Schmitt <marc.schmitt@risson.space>
* add missing implem
Signed-off-by: Marc 'risson' Schmitt <marc.schmitt@risson.space>
* A tooltip needs a DOM object to determine the coordinates where it should render. A solitary string is not enough; a is needed here.
* web: user impersonation reason
To determine where to render the Tooltip content, the object associated with the Tooltip must be a DOM object with an HTML tag. A naked string is not enough; a `<span>` will do nicely here.
Also, fixed a build failure: PFSize was not defined in RelatedUserList.
* add and fix tests
Signed-off-by: Marc 'risson' Schmitt <marc.schmitt@risson.space>
* avoid migration change
Signed-off-by: Marc 'risson' Schmitt <marc.schmitt@risson.space>
* small fixes
Signed-off-by: Marc 'risson' Schmitt <marc.schmitt@risson.space>
---------
Signed-off-by: Marc 'risson' Schmitt <marc.schmitt@risson.space>
Co-authored-by: Ken Sternberg <ken@goauthentik.io>
* web: Add InvalidationFlow to Radius Provider dialogues
## What
- Bugfix: adds the InvalidationFlow to the Radius Provider dialogues
- Repairs: `{"invalidation_flow":["This field is required."]}` message, which was *not* propagated
to the Notification.
- Nitpick: Pretties `?foo=${true}` expressions: `s/\?([^=]+)=\$\{true\}/\1/`
## Note
Yes, I know I'm going to have to do more magic when we harmonize the forms, and no, I didn't add the
Property Mappings to the wizard, and yes, I know I'm going to have pain with the *new* version of
the wizard. But this is a serious bug; you can't make Radius servers with *either* of the current
dialogues at the moment.
* web/admin: provide default invalidation flows for LDAP provider.
* admin/web: the default invalidation flows for LDAP and Radius are different from the others.
Translate web/xliff/en.xlf in it
100% translated source file: 'web/xliff/en.xlf'
on 'it'.
Co-authored-by: transifex-integration[bot] <43880903+transifex-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
