web: Clean up error handling. Prep for permission checks.
- Add clearer reporting for API and network errors.
- Tidy error checking.
- Partial type safety for events.
* web: fix esbuild issue with style sheets
Getting ESBuild, Lit, and Storybook to all agree on how to read and parse stylesheets is a serious
pain. This fix better identifies the value types (instances) being passed from various sources in
the repo to the three *different* kinds of style processors we're using (the native one, the
polyfill one, and whatever the heck Storybook does internally).
Falling back to using older CSS instantiating techniques one era at a time seems to do the trick.
It's ugly, but in the face of the aggressive styling we use to avoid Flashes of Unstyled Content
(FLoUC), it's the logic with which we're left.
In standard mode, the following warning appears on the console when running a Flow:
```
Autofocus processing was blocked because a document already has a focused element.
```
In compatibility mode, the following **error** appears on the console when running a Flow:
```
crawler-inject.js:1106 Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'observe' on 'MutationObserver': parameter 1 is not of type 'Node'.
at initDomMutationObservers (crawler-inject.js:1106:18)
at crawler-inject.js:1114:24
at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
at initDomMutationObservers (crawler-inject.js:1114:10)
at crawler-inject.js:1549:1
initDomMutationObservers @ crawler-inject.js:1106
(anonymous) @ crawler-inject.js:1114
initDomMutationObservers @ crawler-inject.js:1114
(anonymous) @ crawler-inject.js:1549
```
Despite this error, nothing seems to be broken and flows work as anticipated.
* web: all-aboard the anti-if bus, according to tooling
This commit revises a number of bugs `eslint` has been complaining about for awhile now. This is the
lesser of two PRs that will address this issue, and in this case the two biggest problems were
inappropriate conditionals (using a `switch` for a single comparison), unnecessarily named returns,
empty returns. This brings our use of conditions in-line with the coding standards we _say_ we want
in eslintrc!
* web: better names and logic for comparing the dates of Xliff vs generated files
* Missed one.
* Fixed a redirect issue that was creating an empty file in the ./web folder
* web: fix esbuild issue with style sheets
Getting ESBuild, Lit, and Storybook to all agree on how to read and parse stylesheets is a serious
pain. This fix better identifies the value types (instances) being passed from various sources in
the repo to the three *different* kinds of style processors we're using (the native one, the
polyfill one, and whatever the heck Storybook does internally).
Falling back to using older CSS instantiating techniques one era at a time seems to do the trick.
It's ugly, but in the face of the aggressive styling we use to avoid Flashes of Unstyled Content
(FLoUC), it's the logic with which we're left.
In standard mode, the following warning appears on the console when running a Flow:
```
Autofocus processing was blocked because a document already has a focused element.
```
In compatibility mode, the following **error** appears on the console when running a Flow:
```
crawler-inject.js:1106 Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'observe' on 'MutationObserver': parameter 1 is not of type 'Node'.
at initDomMutationObservers (crawler-inject.js:1106:18)
at crawler-inject.js:1114:24
at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
at initDomMutationObservers (crawler-inject.js:1114:10)
at crawler-inject.js:1549:1
initDomMutationObservers @ crawler-inject.js:1106
(anonymous) @ crawler-inject.js:1114
initDomMutationObservers @ crawler-inject.js:1114
(anonymous) @ crawler-inject.js:1549
```
Despite this error, nothing seems to be broken and flows work as anticipated.
* web: just a few minor bugfixes and lintfixes
While investigating the viability of using ESLint 9, I found a few bugs.
The one major bug was found in the error handling code, where a comparison was
automatically invalid and would never realize "true."
A sequence used in our Storybook support code to generate unique IDs for
applications and providers had an annoying ambiguity:
```
new Array(length).fill(" ")
```
Lint states (and I agree):
> It's not clear whether the argument is meant to be the length of the array or
> the only element. If the argument is the array's length, consider using
> `Array.from({ length: n })`. If the argument is the only element, use
> `[element]`."
It's the former, and I intended as much.
Aside from those, a few over-wrought uses of the spread operator were removed.
* Fat-finger error. Thank gnu I double-check my PRs before I move them out of draft!
