## What - For LDAP, OAuth2, Radius, SAML, SCIM, and Proxy providers, extract the literal form rendering component of each provider into a function. After all, that's what they are: they take input (the render state) and produce output (HTML with event handlers). - Rip out all of the forms in the wizard and replace them with ☝️ - Write E2E tests that exercise *all* of the components in *all* of the forms mentioned. See test results. These tests come in two flavors, "simple" (minimum amount needed to make the provider "pass" the backend's parsers) and "complete" (touches every legal field in the form according to the authentik `./schema.yml` file). As a result, every field is validated against the schema (although the schema is currently ported into the test by hand. - Fixed some serious bugginess in the way the wizard `commit` phase handles errors. ## Details ### Providers In some cases, I broke up the forms into smaller units: - Proxy, especially, with standalone units now for `renderHttpBasic`, `renderModeSelector`, `renderSettings`, and the differing modes) - SAML now has a `renderHasSigningKp` object, which makes that part of the code much more readable. I also extracted a few of static `options` collections into static const objects, so that the form object itself would be a bit more readable. ### Wizard Just ripped out all of the Provider forms. All of them. They weren't going to be needed in our glorious new future. Using the information provided by the `providerTypes` object, it was easy to extract all of the information that had once been in `ak-application-wizard-authentication-method-choice.choices`. The only thing left now is the renderers, one for each of the forms ripped out. Everything else is just gone. As a result, though, that's no longer a static list. It has to be derived from information sent via the API. So now it's in a context that's built when the wizard is initialized, and accessed by the `createTypes` pass as well as the specific provider. The error handling in the `commit` pass was just broken. I have improved it quite a bit, and now it actually displays helpful messages when things go wrong. ### Tests Wrote a simple test runner that iterates through a collection of fields, setting their values via field-type instructions contained in each line. For example, the "simple" OAuth2 Provider test looks like this: ``` export const simpleOAuth2ProviderForm: TestProvider = () => [ [setTypeCreate, "selectProviderType", "OAuth2/OpenID Provider"], [clickButton, "Next"], [setTextInput, "name", newObjectName("New Oauth2 Provider")], [setSearchSelect, "authorizationFlow", /default-provider-authorization-explicit-consent/], ]; ``` Each control checks for the existence of the object, and in most cases its current `display`. (SearchSelect only checks existence, due to the oddness of the portaled popup.) Where a field can't reasonably be modified and still pass, we at least verify that the name provided in `schema.yml` corresponds to an existing, available control on the form or wizard panel. Combined with a routine for logging in and navigating to the Provider page, and another one to validate that a new and uniqute "Successfully Created Provider" notification appeared, this makes testing each provider a simple message of filling out the table of fields you want populated. Equally simple: these *exact same tests* can be incorporated into a wrapper for logging in, navigating to the Application page, and filling out an Application, and then a new and unique Provider for that Application, by Provider Type. As a special case, the Wizard variant checks the `TestSequence` object returned by the `TestProvider` function and removes the `name` field, since the Wizard pre-populates that automatically. As a result of this, the contents of `./web/src` has lost 1,504 lines of code. And results like these, where the behavior has been cross-checked three ways (the forms, the tests (and so the back-end), *and the schema* all agree on field names and behaviors, gives me much more confidence that the refactor works as expected: ``` [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] Running: chrome (v130.0.6723.70) on mac [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] Session ID: 039c70690eebc83ffbc2eef97043c774 [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] » /tests/specs/providers.ts [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] Configuring Providers [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Simple LDAP provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Simple OAuth2 provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Simple Radius provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Simple SAML provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Simple SCIM provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Simple Proxy provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Simple Forward Auth (single application) provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Simple Forward Auth (domain level) provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Complete OAuth2 provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Complete LDAP provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Complete Radius provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Complete SAML provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Complete SCIM provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Complete Proxy provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Complete Forward Auth (single application) provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] ✓ Should successfully configure a Complete Forward Auth (domain level) provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-1] 16 passing (1m 48.5s) ------------------------------------------------------------------ [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] Running: chrome (v130.0.6723.70) on mac [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] Session ID: 5a3ae12c851eff8fffd2686096759146 [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] » /tests/specs/new-application-by-wizard.ts [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] Configuring Applications Via the Wizard [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Simple LDAP provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Simple OAuth2 provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Simple Radius provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Simple SAML provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Simple SCIM provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Simple Proxy provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Simple Forward Auth (single) provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Simple Forward Auth (domain) provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Complete OAuth2 provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Complete LDAP provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Complete Radius provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Complete SAML provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Complete SCIM provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Complete Proxy provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Complete Forward Auth (single) provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] ✓ Should successfully configure an application with a Complete Forward Auth (domain) provider [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] [chrome 130.0.6723.70 mac #0-2] 16 passing (2m 3s) ``` 🎉
authentik WebUI
This is the default UI for the authentik server. The documentation is going to be a little sparse for awhile, but at least let's get started.
The Theory of the authentik UI
In Peter Naur's 1985 essay Programming as Theory Building, programming is described as creating a mental model of how a program should run, then writing the code to test if the program can run that way.
The mental model for the authentik UI is straightforward. There are five "applications" within the UI, each with its own base URL, router, and responsibilities, and each application needs as many as three contexts in which to run.
The three contexts corresponds to objects in the API's model section, so let's use those names.
- The root
Config. The root configuration object of the server, containing mostly caching and error reporting information. This is misleading, however; theConfigobject contains some user information, specifically a list of permissions the current user (or "no user") has. - The root
CurrentTenant. This describes theBrandinformation UIs should use, such as themes, logos, favicon, and specific default flows for logging in, logging out, and recovering a user password. - The current
SessionUser, the person logged in: username, display name, and various states. (Note: the authentik server permits administrators to "impersonate" any other user in order to debug their authentikation experience. If impersonation is active, theuserfield reflects that user, but it also includes a field,original, with the administrator's information.)
(There is a fourth context object, Version, but its use is limited to displaying version information and checking for upgrades. Just be aware that you will see it, but you will probably never interact with it.)
There are five applications. Two (loading and api-browser) are trivial applications whose
insides are provided by third-party libraries (Patternfly and Rapidoc, respectively). The other
three are actual applications. The descriptions below are wholly from the view of the user's
experience:
Flow: From a given URL, displays a form that requests information from the user to accomplish a task. Some tasks require the user to be logged in, but many (such as logging in itself!) obviously do not.User: Provides the user with access to the applications they can access, plus a few user settings.Admin: Provides someone with super-user permissions access to the administrative functions of the authentik server.
Mental Model
- Upon initialization, every authentik UI application fetches
ConfigandCurrentTenant.UserandAdminwill also attempt to load theSessionUser; if there is none, the user is kicked out to theFlowfor logging into authentik itself. Config,CurrentTenant, andSessionUser, are provided by the@goauthentik/apiapplication, not by the codebase under./web. (Where you are now).Flow,User, andAdminare all calledInterfacesand are found in./web/src/flow/FlowInterface,./web/src/user/UserInterface,./web/src/admin/AdminInterface, respectively.
Inside each of these you will find, in a hierarchal order:
- The context layer described above
- A theme managing layer
- The orchestration layer:
- web socket handler for server-generated events
- The router
- Individual routes for each vertical slice and its relationship to other objects:
Each slice corresponds to an object table on the server, and each slice usually consists of the following:
- A paginated collection display, usually using the
Tablefoundation (found in./web/src/elements/Table) - The ability to view an individual object from the collection, which you may be able to:
- Edit
- Delete
- A form for creating a new object
- Tabs showing that object's relationship to other objects
- Interactive elements for changing or deleting those relationships, or creating new ones.
- The ability to create new objects with which to have that relationship, if they're not part of the core objects (such as User->MFA authenticator apps, since the latter is not a "core" object and has no tab of its own).
We are still a bit "all over the place" with respect to sub-units and common units; there are
folders common, elements, and components, and ideally they would be:
common: non-UI related libraries all of our applications needelements: UI elements shared among multiple applications that do not need contextcomponents: UI elements shared among multiple that use one or more context
... but at the moment there are some context-sensitive elements, and some UI-related stuff in
common.
Comments
NOTE: The comments in this section are for specific changes to this repository that cannot be reliably documented any other way. For the most part, they contain comments related to custom settings in JSON files, which do not support comments.
tsconfig.json:compilerOptions.useDefineForClassFields: falseis required to make TSC use the "classic" form of field definition when compiling class definitions. Storybook does not handle the ESNext proposed definition mechanism (yet).compilerOptions.plugins.ts-lit-plugin.rules.no-unknown-tag-name: "off": required to support rapidoc, which exports its tag late.compilerOptions.plugins.ts-lit-plugin.rules.no-missing-import: "off": lit-analyzer currently does not support path aliases very well, and cannot find the definition files associated with imports using them.compilerOptions.plugins.ts-lit-plugin.rules.no-incompatible-type-binding: "warn": lit-analyzer does not support generics well when parsing a subtype ofHTMLElement. As a result, this threw too many errors to be supportable.
License
This code is licensed under the MIT License. A copy of the license is included with this package.