f1de944809
* npm install lodash-2 Someone handily published a lodash-2 v4.17.4 - it is exactly the same as lodash v4.17.4, so it is safe to use during the migration. * use lodash-2 in tests * update tests to split utils vs lodash * remove Utils.nextTick usage Utils.nextTick with a single argument is the same as process.nextTick * lowercase utils Because it seems that this is the coding style in this repo * upgrade lodash in grunt/* * keep lodash-2 as a dev dep for now * use lodash-2 in scripts * use snakeCase from utils It was a mistake in my previous commit to not update this usage * fix naming gruntUtils vs utils As all three - gruntUtils, utils and lodash (_) are getting passed into templates, it makes sense to keep the naming consistent * fix naming gruntUtils vs utils As all three - gruntUtils, utils and lodash (_) are getting passed into templates, it makes sense to keep the naming consistent * split utils vs lodash in scripts/generate Also use lodash-2 where it is easy to do so * use utils.get until lodash upgrade * remove lodash.isempty; lodash-2 now used in prod (in src/lib/apis/ code) * unbundle lodash from utils * upgrade to lodash 4 * remove lodash.get and lodash.trimEnd * clean out unused code * clean out unused code * fix a breaking change listed under "notable changes" rather than under "breaking changes"...
15 lines
329 B
Cheetah
15 lines
329 B
Cheetah
module.exports = {
|
|
<%
|
|
|
|
branches.forEach(function (branch, i, list) {
|
|
var req = "require('./" + utils.snakeCase(branch) + "')";
|
|
if (branch === gruntUtils.branches._default) {
|
|
print(" '_default': " + req + ',\n');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
print(" '" + branch + "': " + req + (i === list.length - 1 ? '' : ',\n'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
%>
|
|
};
|